Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Possible reasons for differences are deliberate or incorrect settings in the SAP system or a modification of the standard report. Based on the cause of the differences, it must be decided to what extent the monthly/quarterly VAT return (preliminary VAT return) values have to be adjusted. In addition, it must be selected whether the tax base of the RFUMSV00 or the RFUMSV10 should be decisive for further reconciliations. Since matching the tax bases of both reports is important for the completeness and accuracy of the monthly/quarterly VAT return (preliminary VAT return), this reconciliation is also the basis for the reconciliations 4 to 8, where both reports are used. If the reconciliation 3 contains errors, the system will inform you the user in the subsequent reconciliations.

...

When processing the reconciliations, you it can decide be decided whether this is a VAT report relevant or not relevant deviation. If the deviation is not relevant, the finding is set to the status [green]. 

...

The aim of the reconciliation 9 is to identify whether the reported values in the ESL match to the values in the monthly VAT return. In order to perform this reconciliation in the VAT@GTC you need the amounts reported in the ESL are needed
The tax code defines what relevant values from the VAT return are used for the reconciliation. That is why it is necessary to identify in the [Tax Code] dialogue in the [Master data] main area whether they are relevant for the ESL. Using the form field assignment in the [Mapping of tax codes] dialogue the VAT@GTC differentiates between the intra-community supply (field 41), reverse charge supply (field 21) and intra-community triangular transactions (field 42). In the reconciliation the tax bases of the tax codes mapped to these fields are added and compared with the entries in the import dialogue or added up import data.

...